The problem is, banks have too many humans.
What do you call the sacrifice of one person's privacy in an attempt to save the privacy of over 1300? If you're a bank, you call it collateral damage.
When I was a kid I earned my first paycheck passing out fliers for a neighbor who was starting a pool cleaning business. With my first $13 in hand, my grandfather took me to the a bank in walking distance to my home, got me a tour of the vault from the branch manager, a neat pouch to hold all my coin, a full explanation of the principals of savings and loans, and helped me open my very first savings account. Believe it or not, back then, all my account information was stored on a double-sided index card behind the teller.
Today, things are much more complicated. Gone are the index cards and passbooks, most of the employees, tellers and branches, a good deal of the service, interest-bearing accounts with only $13 in them, and a lot of the customers' money. Today, it's all computerized, and most banks even attach various penalties to discourage human contact.
I know an awful lot about electronic data systems, but I don't pretend to fully understand how the modern banking system works. Sometimes, I think I do--from a mechanical (as opposed to financial) perspective. But then something convinces me that I don't. For instance, you know how every so often your bank emails its customers' names, addresses, Social Security numbers, and loan information to Gmail? ... CONTINUE READING »
Similar Blog & News Articles
- Bank Sends Sensitive E-mail to Wrong Gmail Address, Sues Google :: Wired: Threat Level
- Google, bank resolve issue over misfired e-mail :: CNET News.com
- Judge Orders Gmail Account Deactivated After Bank Screws Up :: Wired: Threat Level
- Bank Sends Email to Wrong Gmail User, Sues Google For His Identity :: Mashable!
- Judge Rules Against Gmail User After Bank Screws Up :: Mashable!
- Bank sues Google for ID of Gmail user :: Latest from Computerworld
- Bank snafu sets up privacy clash with Google :: Business
“Blood in the Birdcage” (Forensics: You Decide, Discovery Channel)
One body. One suspect. Two theories. A laptop. A birdcage. A bloody crime scene. Two trials. Two hung juries. No convictions. One unsolved mystery.
From Investigation Discovery:
"When a beloved music professor -- David Stagg -- discovers the dead body of his long-time partner, Bill Jennings, he claims he's walked into the aftermath of a tragic suicide. But as investigators descend on the scene, they immediately realize that this reported suicide is clearly a homicide. Is it possible the professor is behind this vicious crime, or has he been falsely accused? The forensic experts on each side battle it out. Which side will you agree with?" (60 min. - First aired 9/14/2009 on Investigation Discovery / Discovery ID's "Forensics: You Decide)
Friends from the couple's active social group were in total disbelief. Few could imagine David Stagg involved in the murder of his long-time partner. Forensic evidence was inconclusive. Though blood evidence was found throughout the crime scene, no blood or defensive wounds could be found on David Stagg. An unknown set of fingerprints were found at the scene. Computer evidence from Jennings' laptop showed--at least from Jennings' perspective--a tumultuous relationship. But, enough to justify a motive for murder?
There were also a series of suicidal emails and typed letters left by Jennings that charted a history of both love for Stagg, and deep emotional turmoil. And, one final letter--typed on April 24, 2004, the night of the murder--would become one of the most contested pieces of evidence that two juries would have to consider.
On one thing, both sides agreed: Bill Jennings did not take his own life. ... CONTINUE READING »
Similar Wikipedia Articles
Let’s play $100 Password!

You probably won't find much sympathy for Elane Cioni. A mistress scorned, she's been convicted of hacking into the email account of her former-boss, the man with whom she was having an affair, and then his wife, his other girlfriends, and even his kids. (I suppose, that doesn't engender much sympathy for her main-target either.) But, you might be surprised to find out Cioni's not a very good hacker.
You might also be surprised to learn that there's a market for professional hacking and, similar to many legitimate professions, the jobs are going offshore. When it comes to password hacking, those who can, do. Those who can't, outsource. When Cioni wanted back into her boyfriend's life she turned to one of an increasing number of web sites with offers like this:
"Need to monitor your Child? Your Spouse? Your Boyfriend/Girlfriend? We Hack Passwords for $100 USD. We Crack all major web based emails. This include Hotmail, Yahoo! AOL and Gmail. We Provide Proofs Before payment." ... CONTINUE READING »
Similar Blog & News Articles
- Hackers Have It Easy :: NPR Topics: Technology
- Services' E-Mail Hacking Illegal, but Officials Need More Than That to Prosecute :: Wash Post Technology
- Email Passwords? $20 :: @LiveCrunch
- Previously Opened Emails Stored for Less than 181 Days in Web-Based Account May be Obtained by Trial Subpoena :: Electronic Discovery Law
Electronic privacy is for the birds.

Source: Wikipedia
In a match between Bird-brain vs. broadband, you might be surprised to see who wins.
An old friend of mine pointed out what sounded like an interesting story out of South Africa. Tired of slow download speeds, a South African call center pitted a racing pigeon against Telkom South Africa Ltd.’s ADSL data service to see which could move a 4GB file faster. In total it took just under three hours for the bird to fly approximately 50 miles--about 30 times faster than the ADSL service, which had only downloaded 4% of the file in the same time.
I'm afraid we're not really comparing apapane to apapane, or even apapane to ostriches. I doubt, for instance, that the pigeon would fair quite as well over, say, a 500 or 5000 mile "data run". ... CONTINUE READING »
Similar Blog & News Articles
- Pigeon transfers data faster than South Africa's Telkom (Reuters) :: Yahoo! News: Oddly Enough - Reuters
Similar Wikipedia Articles
U.S. Gov. authorizes long-layovers for laptops.
It's sometimes hard to remember, but it wasn't that long ago that most carry-on's bypassed so much as an x-ray screening. Then came the obligatory laptop and shoe removal. And, eventually, the "drink 'em or lose 'em" rule, accompanied by the ever-perplexing debate over what constitutes a "liquid", and how many ounces of it you can carry through a TSA line.
(I once overheard a TSA agent explaining to a traveler that, "anything that can be liquefied is a liquid". I felt compelled to explain that, at the right temperature, the whole airplane could be liquefied--but kept my mouth shut, for fear of missing my flight.)
In recent months, some international travelers have been greeted with an indignity that makes the "patdown" look like a "fist-bump". In the past 10 months, over 1000 people had their laptop computers "detained" and subsequently searched. Most would assume that this was with probable cause, but, the DHS maintains that probable cause is not required for such a search. ... CONTINUE READING »
Similar Blog & News Articles
- Keepers Of The Gate :: Analytical Chemistry News
- Laptop border searches to continue :: CNET News.com
- Tighter Oversight on Border Laptop Searches :: ABC News: U.S.
- Customs and Border Patrol agents are still randomly confiscating laptops - is yours next? :: Consumer Traveler
- ACLU files lawsuit on border laptop searches :: Infoworld News
Similar Wikipedia Articles
CA Court of Appeals provides guidelines for “knowing posession”.
In People v. Michael James Tecklenburg, (2009, 169 Cal. App.4th 1402) the California Court of Appeals considered the relevance and applicability of involuntary "pop-ups" and temporary Internet files (TIF or "cache") to the applicable statute. California's Penal Code section 311.11(a) makes it illegal to "knowingly posses or control" depictions defined as child pornography according to state law (P.C. 314, subd. d). The court specifically considered the variables required to establish "control". ... CONTINUE READING »
Search & Seizure: 9th Cir. Appeals calls “foul” on broad computer searches
When searching a spreadsheet containing the drug test results of 104 professional baseball players federal prosecutors went too far, says the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
After lawfully executing a warrant on a Long Beach, CA drug testing lab for the test results of 10 players, agents uncovered a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet with results of every player that was tested in the program. The government argued that 94 of those results were in "plain sight".
In a 9-2 decision, the court ruled:
"The government should, in future warrant applications, forswear reliance on the plain view doctrine or any similar doctrine that would allow it to retain data to which it has gained access only because it was required to segregate seizable from non-seizable data. If the government doesn’t consent to such a waiver, the magistrate judge should order that the seizable and non-seizable data be separated by an independent third party under the supervision of the court, or deny the warrant altogether." ... CONTINUE READING »
Similar Blog & News Articles
- Decision a Small Consolation for Exposed Players :: ABC News: ESPN Sports
- Feds Wrong To Seize MLB Drug List, Court Rules :: NPR Topics: News
- Appeals court bars feds from using pro baseball players' steroids tests :: Baseball
- Government went too far in Balco sports drug case, says court :: Reuters: U.S.
- Court: Feds Wrong to Seize MLB Drug List :: Latest U.S. Headlines - CBS News
- Court Ruling Small Consolation for Exposed Players :: ABC News: ESPN Sports
- Judge: Feds wrong to seize drug list :: SI.com









