Taking a dump 21st Century style.
Every time Microsoft researcher Gordon Bell takes a dump he learns something about himself. For instance, he know knows that he's visited 221,173 web sites in the last 8 years, and written or received 156,041 emails. He also knows how well his heart is pumping, how many miles he's walked, where he's been, and even with whom he's spoken and visited. In fact, from what most of us consider a waste product, Bell can even decipher how many songs he's listened to, and see pictures videos of the places he's been and the things he's seen.
Fantastic as this may sound, Bell is not the only person on earth who can do this. The same product is flushed from nearly every person every day in North America, and other industrialized nations. More significantly, while most of us are ignorant or deny the very possibility, the government and large corporations are secretly extracting much the same information from each of us that Bell collects himself. ... CONTINUE READING »
Similar Blog & News Articles
Reality TV fans: This is your chance to be on TV’s Big Brother
OK, I'll admit it: I'm a reality TV junkie--including, but not limited to, CBS's Big Brother. (Go ahead, laugh, tease, ridicule. I can handle it.) And, now I come to find Big Brother is a fan of me!
Almost any night of the week, America tunes in to see good looking people who gave up their mundane lives and mediocre livelihoods for a chance have complete strangers watch their every move. If this has always been a dream of yours, I have great news:
Now, you can have complete strangers watch your every move! You don't have to be good looking, and you don't even have to give up your mundane life or mediocre livelihood.
What's the secret? It's called PrimeSense. PrimeSense is a revolutionary set-top box (STB) which, according to the company's web site, "allows a computer to perceive the world in 3D and derive an understanding of the world based on sight, just the way humans do. The device includes a sensor, which sees a user (including their complete surroundings), and a digital component, or 'brain' which learns and understands user movement within those surroundings."
According to CableFAX, a cable industry publication, a "chip resides in a camera on the STB that provides something similar to thermal images, showing how many people are in front of the TV, etc."
PrimeSense was voted Best New Product Idea at CableLabs' Innovation Showcase in Denver, CO. CableLabs (Cable Television Laboratories, Inc.) is a non-profit research and development consortium founded in 1988 by cable operating companies. Votes were cast through informal polling of cable industry executives. Which is good news, if you were hoping to have complete strangers watching your every move. Because, it could be coming to a cable set-top box near you.
Via SlashDot (http://yro.slashdot.org/story/09/08/11/2236252/Sensor-To-Monitor-TV-Watchers-Demoed-At-Cable-Labs?from=rss)
Eye in the sky
I'm going to be unabashedly honest: "Eye in the Sky", by the Alan Parsons Project (1982), never made much sense to me. Sure, I understand it's an homage to George Orwell's, "1984", but the lyrics make no sense to me. You know what else makes no sense to me? Mayor R. Rex Parris' project: an "eye in the sky"--a 24/7 arial survellance system to be flown by the L.A. County Sheriff's Department 5000 feet above Lancaster, California.
Parris says, on the city's web site:
“This technology is nothing short of remarkable,” said Parris. “I entered my address, and within seconds the camera had focused so well on my property that I was able to see both of my dogs and identify which was which – all from five miles away. This type of technology has the potential to drive criminals completely out of our community.”
My guess is he'll drive some of the citizens out as well--if they don't drive him out first.
Amazon goes Big Brother on Kindle’s “1984″
In an ironically Orwellian move, on July 17, 2009 Amazon.com remotely deleted illegally-sold copies of George Orwell's "1984" and "Animal Farm" from its customer's Kindle e-book readers.
This issue is unique to electronic goods, so it's important to parse the words carefully. The books were indeed sold illegally through, and by, Amazon.com. The legitimacy of the purchases, however, does not seem to be in question. The Kindle owners made a legal purchase, of an item that was not legal for Amazon.com to sell in the United States.
The electronic books that Amazon sold are in the public domain in Canada and Australia, but not in the United States. Effectively, works in the public domain belong to the public. What can be confusing, however, is that something in the public domain--or free to use-- in one country, may not be public domain in another. Naturally, an Amazon.com purchaser might simply assume--considering that Amazon requires their billing address to make a purchase--that the item they were purchasing was neither free, nor illegal to purchase
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13512_3-10290133-23.html
Similar Blog & News Articles
- Digging Deeper Into Amazon's Orwellian Moment :: Medialoper
- Amazon apologizes for Orwell Kindle mishap but was it too late? :: Web Ink Now
- Some E-Books Are More Equal Than Others :: Pogue's Posts
- Student Sues Amazon For Deleting His Homework :: Bloggers Blog: Blogging the Blogsphere
- Amazon Removes Books from Kindle, Exposing the True Concern: They're Watching, They're in Control :: michaelzimmer.org
- Amazon Removes Orwell Books From Kindles :: Gizmos, Gadgets, Technology and more
Similar Wikipedia Articles
GPS-Tracking Car Tax is Gaining Traction
The first set of mass-production plug-in electric vehicles are slated to arrive this year. Among other incentives, they won't pay a dime in fuel tax. Looking to head-off that shortfall, several states, including California, Oregon, and Missouri have investigated charging by the mile, instead of by the gallon.
Why not simply base mileage on a vehicle's odometer? Beside the obvious tampering concerns, a state has no right to collect for out-of-state mileage. In the past, it had always been assumed that anyone traveling interstate would eventually need to fill-up with taxable liquid fuel at a regulated pump, thus contributing to each state's highway improvement budget.
Not so, in this modern era. Electric vehicles, like GM's Volt, can be charged from any conventional outlet, or faster via a dedicated higher-voltage charger. Though, theoretically, taxes will be paid on the energy consumed, those taxes don't directly contribute to things like highway improvement.
Now comes the increasingly ever-depreciating GPS with the ability, not only, to collect state and interstate road-usage data with a fair degree of accuracy and tamper-resistance, but also the ability to transmit that data wirelessly on-schedule, on-demand, or even in real-time.
It's that last feature that has many up in arms. How else could this data be used? It could, for instance, report traffic violations to municipalities without involving a law enforcement officer, even as they occur. It could also be used to prove that someone was speeding, or is a habitual speeder, after the fact. Perhaps as evidence in a traffic accident. Or for the purposes of increasing one's insurance premium. It could be used to automatically alert authorities when a suspect returns to their jurisdiction, or to the "scene of the crime". For that matter, it could be used after an incident to locate all individuals who were in the area, and even retrace their path. Spouses could subpoena the data as evidence of infidelity. Ex-spouses could use it to collect child or spousal support.
Some have suggested that such a system would come with built-in privacy mechanisms. For instance, it might only record the mileage in each state, and not specific location data. The biggest problem with that is, now you have no way to audit the accuracy of the figures, or the system as a whole. It presents the possibility of systemic inaccuracies or even gross abuse. In other words, much like electronic voting, how do citizens patrol their government?
Read more @ Kansas City Star
PrivateEye is Watching You
Ever get the feeling you're being watched? I do. But, usually, it's just by the guy in seat 12B flying next to me. Who can blame him? No doubt, the screen on my laptop is far more interesting than the back of 11B, or the in-flight magazine. Bill Anderson, security-expert-turned-CEO, knows that feeling too.
Anderson developed software that uses a computer's camera to track the user's eyes. When the user looks away, the contents of the screen distort to become unreadable by anyone else. According to Anderson, his consumer product, PrivateEye, is also sophisticated enough to recognize the presence of other faces in the background and alert the user.
Anderson is also marketing Chameleon, another product using the same technology, to defense and intelligence agencies. While these agencies clearly have an obvious and immediate need for security, it also makes one wonder how else such technology might be applied.
For instance, web usability experts, like Jakob Nielsen, use specially-equipped computer monitors to analyze how people read web pages, and even view online video. But, Anderson's device is unique in that it relies entirely on software, exploiting equipment already on many, if not most, people's desks.
Imagine how software like this could be used to monitor work productivity, or to infer "interest" as opposed to "action". Such as, the focus of one's attention, compared to the eventual click or keystroke. In an annual review, Human Resources, might note the amount of time an employee spends looking at photos in her cubicle, compared to work on the screen. Meanwhile, similar software could be used as a sort-of "desire detector" for prosecuting sex crimes.









